new w2k3 2ndary (member) + existing w2k primary (DC) = problem?

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

I'm setting up W2K3 as a secondary DNS server in our office. A W2K Server is
already the primary. It's a primary zone. While we do have a Linux box, I'm
not going to join it to the domain, so shouldnt I be safe to change to
AD-integrated? (I like the whole 'secure updates' thing.) The thing is, the
W2K3 Server is only a member server, not a DC (yet). Is that a problem?
Will it still replicate?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Documentation for simple NT4 to 2003
    ... to go from NT4 to W2K3 AD you have 2 possibilities: ... upgrade NT4 domain to AD ... How To Upgrade a Windows NT 4.0-Based PDC to a Windows Server 2003-Based ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: Basic NT4 to w2k3 migration questions
    ... > read other threads written by otehrs who followed advice similar to your ... Our Exchange mail goes to a Linux mail ... >>> new hardware and then upgrading it to w2k3 which sounds a bit idiotic to ... This includes a Windows 2003 Exchance server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: Problem establish trust between NT4 and W2K3 AD
    ... Do both the NT4 and Windows 2003 have wins clients loaded and pointing ... > I have installed WINS on the W2K3 server and point all DCs to ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Moving First DC in Forest
    ... fully supports the Exchange 2003 Server. ... BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx ... use the W2K3 SP1 CD! ... introduce w2k3 DCs ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Basic NT4 to w2k3 migration questions
    ... > The NT 4.0 PDC is the ONLY DC in a NT domain that carries a writeable copy ... > Migrating using ADMT requires you to set up two separate domains "side by ... I make no claims to be a w2k3 ... Our current Exchange 5.0 server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)