Re: Named based DNS
- From: "Bill" <btcchan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:08:39 +0800
Hi everybody,
Thanks for your suggestion and so as Ulf and kevin. Host header is the
solution I am looking for. Thanks again for the help from you guys.
Bill
"Jeff Cochran" <jeff.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42a2d6fe.273032046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> I 'd like to host about 10 web sites on my Windows Server 2003, but I
can
> >> only get hold of one external IP address. That's why I'd like to use
named
> >> based DNS resolution to deal with this issue. If I choose to insall a
port
> >> of BIND, can I host 10 web sites on a Windows Server 2003 using one
external
> >> IP address. Otherwise, do you have any suggestion?
>
> That's not what NameD is or does. Nor do you need it to. What you
> want to do is run multiple web sites on one IP. See the following
> links and post any more questions on this in the IIS newsgroup.
>
> Running mutiple web sites on a single IP address:
> http://www.iisanswers.com/Top10FAQ/t10-hostheaders.htm
> http://www.iisanswers.com/articles/dns_for_iis.htm
>
> HOW TO: Use Host Header Names to Configure Multiple Web Sites in
> Internet Information Services 6.0:
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=324287
>
> Jeff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Named based DNS
- From: Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]
- Re: Named based DNS
- References:
- Re: Named based DNS
- From: Bill
- Re: Named based DNS
- From: Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [MVP]
- Re: Named based DNS
- From: Jeff Cochran
- Re: Named based DNS
- Prev by Date: Re: Joining Existing Domain
- Next by Date: Re: Joining Existing Domain
- Previous by thread: Re: Named based DNS
- Next by thread: Re: Named based DNS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|