Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: "Herb Martin" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 10:53:31 -0500
"merc" <merc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7A4DEF27-B009-4B0A-B29B-46206C818110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Herb,
>
> I think you're a little confused. Please read the original post again.
It was probably this part that led to the confusion when
you wrote: "prevent ALL automatic additions/changes to the DNS records"
Sounds like you have dynamic changes allowed.
Also you were discussing DCs and the support of
an AD domain's zone which should be dynamic.
Your are really going at this the hard way -- and
very insecure to be exposing a DC on the Internet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: merc
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- References:
- Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: merc
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: merc
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- From: merc
- Flag for public AD integrated zones
- Prev by Date: Re: Wins and DNS
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with Reverse lookup zone
- Previous by thread: Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- Next by thread: Re: Flag for public AD integrated zones
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|