Re: Deploy Design Question
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: Greg Sr: "Event 7063 is recorded in the DNS log..."
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Weird DNS problems"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Deploy Design Question"
- Maybe reply: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Deploy Design Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:57:35 -0700
OK - so in the late hour I was overly estimating.
Let's make those 100%s into 95 +/- 5 %s :-)
-- Roger Abell Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security) MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message news:uLrgWgnXEHA.4000@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > I have watched Windows DNS use since W2k beta, > and wrote the first "Windows 2000 DNS" book back > in 1999. Since that time, my own "rough" estimate > would be 100% of those organizations that did not > have a well-established, pre-existing DNS service, > and, now that Bind family DNS are adept at DDNS > the number is on its way to becoming all dynamic > there also. Once securing DDNS is "all worked out" > so it is without manual intervention, DDNS will likely > be the way things are done everywhere. > > -- > Roger Abell > Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security) > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA > "April" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:2359201c45e4d$aea024c0$a501280a@phx.gbl... > > With Windows DNS, how many, percentage of new deloyments > > and in use, actually use DDNS? The default for AD > > Intergrated zone is secure update only, while standard is > > No. > >
- Next message: Greg Sr: "Event 7063 is recorded in the DNS log..."
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Weird DNS problems"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Deploy Design Question"
- Maybe reply: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Deploy Design Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|