Re: Microsoft Windows 2000 Server DNS Question
From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (J.deBoynePollard_at_Tesco.NET)
Date: 03/25/04
- Next message: Stephane Bouvard: "Re: Why would anybody use .LOCAL?"
- Previous message: Kevin D. Goodknecht [MVP]: "Re: Why would anybody use .LOCAL?"
- In reply to: Corbin O'Reilly: "Microsoft Windows 2000 Server DNS Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:20:49 +0000
COR> On our internal W2K DNS Server do I need to remove the old host
COR> record for WWW and replace it with the new external IP address
COR> of the hosting server?
If you wish to continue using the first method, yes.
COR> Do I need to rename the WWW server on our LAN to a different
COR> name?
What "name" are you thinking of changing ? (Hint: Where is that "name" stored ?)
COR> Do I need to setup some kind of alias?
No. You could use the second method, which wouldn't exactly be an alias
but would reduce the number of entities that have to track any changes
made to the IP address used by your web hosting service.
<URL:http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/dns-split-horizon-common-server-names.html>
- Next message: Stephane Bouvard: "Re: Why would anybody use .LOCAL?"
- Previous message: Kevin D. Goodknecht [MVP]: "Re: Why would anybody use .LOCAL?"
- In reply to: Corbin O'Reilly: "Microsoft Windows 2000 Server DNS Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
