Re: Secure updates.
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 03/13/04
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: NetDig 2.0 rc3"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Hide internal machine name~"
- In reply to: mike: "RE: Secure updates."
- Next in thread: mike: "Re: Secure updates."
- Reply: mike: "Re: Secure updates."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:54:06 -0700
Mike,
While off of the above thread is true, you do not need to
modifiy the ACL to accomplish the restriction you seem
interested in verifying.
When a client machine causes a record to be defined, it
becomes the owner/creator and through this has permissions
on the records it has defined, which same permissions are not
granted in general to other principals. This way, a machine is
not going to have its records pulled out from under it by some
other machine that is allowed to do dynamic updates to the zone.
-- Roger Abell Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security) MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA "mike" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:89CB682F-8049-4B19-A322-BFA1A80F8F09@microsoft.com... > Thanks Kristin, > > Question answered. > > mike
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: NetDig 2.0 rc3"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Hide internal machine name~"
- In reply to: mike: "RE: Secure updates."
- Next in thread: mike: "Re: Secure updates."
- Reply: mike: "Re: Secure updates."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|