Re: DNS Zone Type
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: DNS Error on Dial Out connection"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: DNS connections"
- In reply to: Ricardo: "Re: DNS Zone Type"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:39:10 -0700
Primary mean the machine that is indicated in the SOA
record for the zone
There may be only one primary when the zone is on both
Windows DNS and Bind. The other will have only an NS
record, indicating it is a secondary.
-- Roger Abell Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security) MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA "Ricardo" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:01476BA0-99BD-466C-86B2-BD12FFEC15E4@microsoft.com... > OK..... > Just one more question.... > > Can I put the same primary zone name on both DNS (W2K and Bind) ? example: ricardo.com > > > Thanks once more, > > Ricardo > > ----- Roger Abell wrote: ----- > > Improve as compared to what ?? > > Whether the Windows DNS uses your Bind as a Forwarder, some other > DNS as one, or uses no Forwarder at all but only the root servers, are > all viable ways to provide name resolution. > > -- > Roger Abell > Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security) > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA > "Ricardo" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:9FDEB6DB-3DC2-4F2D-BE1C-5CECFD85B72B@microsoft.com... > > So, if I deploy a new Windows DNS with a AD Integrated zone, configure the > clients computer the use it to solve internal names and configure a > forwarder on W2K DNS to the Bind DNS, do you think I'll improve the speedy > of logon and resorces access, In addition to promote internet access ? > >> ----- Roger Abell wrote: ----- > >> "Ricardo" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:85A8A65F-9188-49D4-9637-6804A642BC52@microsoft.com... > >> I have a Linux (BIND) DNS Server installed on my network that > solves > > Internet names. Now I want to deploy Active Directory and a WIndows > 2000 DNS > > Server to improve logon spent time. > >> For the best performance, this new Windows 2000 DNS Server must > have a > > Secondary DNS Zone for the BIND DNS, or it must have a AD Integrated > DNS > > zone with a forwarder to the BIND DNS Server ? > >> Actually, it should hold the zone(s) used to support AD, and AD > integrated > > with secured updates enabled is recommended. It may also either hold > a > > secondary copy of the zones on Bind, use that Bind as a Forwarder, or > both > > in order to resolve the zone(s) that are primary on that Bind. > > Assuming the zones on that Bind are properly registered and delegated > > with/by their parent, then neither of these are needed. It could use > a > > different DNS as a Forwarder, or none and just use > > root hints. > >>> If the answer is to configure a Forwarder with a AD Integrated > zone, will > > clients computer be able to access internet, once they will be > configured > > with the IP of this server for DNS settings? > >>> Think of the path the query takes, the so-called resolution path. Is > there > > an available answer to the query from a DNS server along that path ? > It > > you use your Bind as a forwarder, then internet > > access via name may be slowed to the speed of the Bind acting as a > > forwarder, and if you disable use of root hints on the Windows DNS > then all > > outside access is fully dependent on the quality of you Bind. > >>> Thanks, > >>>
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: DNS Error on Dial Out connection"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: DNS connections"
- In reply to: Ricardo: "Re: DNS Zone Type"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
