Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- From: abckid <abckid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:08:01 -0800
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
Is there any step-by-step guide for configuration or failover planning ?
Thanks again.
abc.
"Marcin" wrote:
Active-Active cluster implies that you will two or more resource groups,.
which under "normal" circumstances will be running on different cluster
nodes. The process of implementing an active-active cluster is for the most
part the same as an active-passive one - the primary difference comes into
plan during failover planning phase (in particular, with multi-node
clusters)...
hth
Marcin
"abckid" <abckid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DDCCBA80-D621-40CD-BEC3-5E9656110341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I could find several solutions searching for posts in Clustering section,
but am still having doubts.
We are going to install servers for our erp application - SAP. One server
shall be DB server (Database) and another CI server (Content). OS -
Windows
Server 2003 -R2, Enterprise Edition and SQL 2005.
We want to have both these servers to be clustered as Active-Active. Going
through the posts, Active-Active does not seem to be recommended from
microsoft compared to Active-Passive cluster.
Can someone please guide about this ?
Also if someone can please provide link - how to configure Active-Active
cluster in Windows server 2003. Sort of step-by-step guide ?
Thanks in advance.
abc
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- From: Marcin
- Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- References:
- Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- From: abckid
- Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- From: Marcin
- Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- Prev by Date: Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- Next by Date: Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- Previous by thread: Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- Next by thread: Re: Active-Active Windows 2003 cluster.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|