Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- From: "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:42:25 -0000
I this case I would use VLAN / 802.1q tagging, most NIC drivers and Network
Switches will support this.
rgds,
Edwin.
"Peter Brown" <PeterBrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:311913B9-F97B-445F-98BD-6CF23D1EAF67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's a very good point, but the issue I run into is that the physicalnodes
are actually blades only have 2 NICs assigned to them; hence the question.your
I know the documentation mentions that it's "OK" to use a teamed NIC as
private and public connections, but just make sure everything isredundant,
and in this case it is.not
Thanks...
"Ryan Sokolowski [MVP]" wrote:
Now that wouldn't really be very highly-available, would it? This would
simplybe in the best spirit of HA and Failover Clustering. I'd recommend
youusing a separate network interface card to provide this functionality.
--
Ryan Sokolowski
MVP - Clustering
MCT, MCITP x3, MCTS x8, MCSE x2, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP
"Peter Brown" <PeterBrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:95E0BE6A-64F0-42CF-B299-0CF56FF9EECA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When setting up a failover cluster in 2008, and using teamed NICs, do
interface,recommend adding a 2nd IP to the team and creating a "Private" network
over
the same teamed interface?
I know it's technically possible and that since everything would be
redundant (switch cores, NICs, etc) and there's just the one
it's
somewhat redundant, I'm just curious to know if it's "recommended" to
configure it that way, or just let everything communicate over the
"public"
network.
Thanks,
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- From: Ole Kristian Bangås
- Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- References:
- Networking configuration recommendations
- From: Peter Brown
- Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- From: Ryan Sokolowski [MVP]
- Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- From: Peter Brown
- Networking configuration recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: Using cluster.exe to create physical disks
- Next by Date: Re: Request for information
- Previous by thread: Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: Networking configuration recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|