Re: Cluster licensing
- From: Russ Sparks <RussSparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:28:03 -0700
Oh, my understanding was that with active/active that it is load balancing
the same database on shared storage and if one fails the other just keeps on
trucking. That can't be done?
"Tim Walsh" wrote:
You'd need a license for each server since you would have 2 instances of SQL.
running at the same time.
Keep in mind when you say Active/Active you are actually saying you have one
instance of SQL running with it's databases and resources running on Node A
and a second instance of SQL with different databases and resources running
on Node B. In the event of a failure, the instance running on the node that
failed moves over to the other node and now you have 2 instances of SQL
running on the same server. Active/Active doesn't mean you are load
balancing your SQL instances across both servers.
So Active/Passive you have 1 instance running at a time, you need 1 license,
Active/Active you have 2 instances running and therefore you need 2
licenses. If you have a 3rd node running an instance you need a 3rd license.
"Russ Sparks" <RussSparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C33484BB-717D-41EC-A647-DC3AAE92FF0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for your reply. What if I go with active/active clustering?
Russ Sparks
"Jeff Hughes [MSFT]" wrote:
No, since SQL is only active on one node at a time, you only need one
license per instance on a cluster.
--
Jeff Hughes, MCSE
Support Escalation Engineer
Microsoft Enterprise Platforms Support (Server Core/Cluster)
"Russ Sparks" <RussSparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9A7A7466-2B44-41F1-8305-D29380152C76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This might not be the right place, but, when clustering SQL server
2005,
do I
need to have an additional SQL 2005 enterprise license for the failover
node?
- References:
- Cluster licensing
- From: Russ Sparks
- Re: Cluster licensing
- From: Jeff Hughes [MSFT]
- Re: Cluster licensing
- From: Russ Sparks
- Re: Cluster licensing
- From: Tim Walsh
- Cluster licensing
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluster licensing
- Next by Date: Re: MSDTC will not go Online
- Previous by thread: Re: Cluster licensing
- Next by thread: Re: MSDTC will not go Online
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|