File Share Resource Fails Status Check
- From: Mike Price <MikePrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:08:01 -0800
This weekend we had two incidents where the following two event log entries
were added to the system event log. I have seen articles and posts suggesting
that changing the IRPStackSize value would alleviate eventid 1055 and
changing the PoolUsageMaximum value to 60 would alleviate eventid 2020. I am
wondering how changing one value would affect the other. In other words could
the problem that causes 1055 also be the cause of 2020 and if 1055 is
alleviated would 2020 not happen? Does that make sense? Also, could 1055 be
cause by having disk activity?
Event Type: Error
Event Source: ClusSvc
Event Category: (2055)
Event ID: 1055
Date: 12/8/2007
Time: 8:18:27 PM
User: N/A
Computer: servername
Description:
Cluster File Share resource 'filesharename' has failed a status check. The
error code is 1130.
Data:
0000: 6a 04 00 00 j...
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Srv
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2020
Date: 12/8/2007
Time: 8:18:40 PM
User: N/A
Computer: servername
Description:
The server was unable to allocate from the system paged pool because the
pool was empty.
Data:
0000: 00 00 04 00 01 00 54 00 ......T.
0008: 00 00 00 00 e4 07 00 c0 ....ä..À
0010: 00 00 00 00 9a 00 00 c0 ......À
0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
0028: 02 00 00 00 ....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: File Share Resource Fails Status Check
- From: Mike Price
- Re: File Share Resource Fails Status Check
- From: Jeff Hughes [MSFT]
- RE: File Share Resource Fails Status Check
- Prev by Date: Re: win2k3 EE Cluster and iSCSI
- Next by Date: Re: Admin Apps Missing on Passive
- Previous by thread: win2k3 EE Cluster and iSCSI
- Next by thread: Re: File Share Resource Fails Status Check
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|