Re: Licensing Information
- From: "Ryan Sokolowski [MVP]" <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:49:56 -0700
First point: Licensing can be very tricky and difficult to understand and
you are always best off discussing this with your Microsoft TAM or point of
contact.
Secondly, you will still need an OS license for each server running W2K3 in
a cluster situation. Clustering does not modify the licensing terms for the
participant node servers.
--
Ryan Sokolowski
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Ausaf" <Ausaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D3007E56-5163-4403-8BB1-A8FD08B37586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Could any one please advise, If I am intending to allow 10 users to access
the 2003 enterprise server through Terminal services, do I require CAL's
for
the Windows Server 2003 enterprise as well as CAL's for Windows Terminal
Services?
Could someone also explain the licensing implications on 2 node cluster
server?
If I have Windows Server 2003 enterprise installed on 2 servers in a
cluster
or
NLB configuration where only one OS is running and accessable at any one
time, do we still require a OS license for both servers? and if so do we
require
CAL's for both servers? or can the licensing service determin which Server
is running and allow access accordinly?
Help..... I am confused.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Terminal Server Session Directory
- Next by Date: Re: NLB Cluster - Ping fails or long time to reply from outside local subnet - SOLVED
- Previous by thread: Re: Security Configuration Wizard
- Next by thread: Re: Licensing Information
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|