Re: Long failover time...
- From: "Kenny Speer" <kenny.speer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:34:08 -0400
Not true. If the DNS server is running properly you won't have an issue. A perfectly configured Cluster can have any number of issues due to a misconfigured/non functioning DNS server. To say that 90% of clusters were misconfigured is complete crap. Often, an admin who owns the clusters does not own the DNS servers and often those DNS servers are not Microsoft servers. It is absolutely an option to put the cluster host names ONLY in the hosts file. Scalability is not an issue, how many nodes are in your cluster? The majority of clusters are 2-4 nodes, 4 lines isn't very many to add to a host file which should not change.
Also, remember, the hosts file has the private interface addresses ONLY, not the public. This insures that all cluster comm from one node to the other will use the cluster comm interface (i'm not just talking about heartbeat here) without requiring or *depending* on an outside service (DNS).
Anyway, I think your argument doesn't hold any water, since we're talking about making MSCS as fault tolerant as possible but then you make it *depend* on DNS for proper operation (not access from clients, but even then, we've used IP addresses for 30 years when DNS goes down).
~kenny
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:eDsCWQd3HHA.4436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Than 90% of clusters were configured wrong to begin with :) Honestly, if DNS is running properly you won't ever need a hosts file. Host files don't scale very well or allow for easy changes!
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Kenny Speer" <kenny.speer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OvjOjNd3HHA.1208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxReally? Hmmm. I've seen 90% of long failover times resolved by doing this.
~kenny
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OdC0XMc3HHA.5984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHosts file! No, DNS works nicely :)
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Kenny Speer" <kenny.speer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uaFNDsH2HHA.5884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxI thought it was recommended to put all cluster names/ips in the hosts file located at:
%WINDIR%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
By default, you don't want your cluster communicating over the public (client access) interface and you don't want your cluster to fail just because your DNS server goes down or is not accessible.
By adding each node to this file on both nodes, you won't even do a name lookup via DNS since Windows uses hosts/lmhosts then DNS.
~kenny
"LOVEBEINGDBA" <LOVEBEINGDBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:EC8A3B7D-E8D7-4B1E-BF4A-DD63E31750E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThanks and I appretiate your reply...
Is it required to create a PTR record for the Cluster Name in the DNS
Server??? We already have a cluster whose name is registered in the DNS only
for forward lookup...
Thanks.
Arun M
"John Fullbright" wrote:
"The server for 143.3.16.172.in-addr.arpa. could not be contacted over
adapter
'Public' to determine whether it accepts DNS registration updates. Retrying
at a later time"
Looks like problems contacting an authoratative DNS server for the reverse
lookup zone that holds the PTR record.
..
"LOVEBEINGDBA" <LOVEBEINGDBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A70ABBFB-6DDA-495D-B715-542869DC021C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Environment:
> Windows Server 2003 R2 x64 SP2
> MSCS 2 node failover cluster
>
> Failover takes about 2 minutes. When doing the failover the > clustername
> take
> a long time to come back up.
>
> Clustername has been registered in the DNS for forward look up .
>
> We have another production cluster and that works fine in the same > setup.
>
> These are the lines I found that are related to this issue from > cluster
> log:
>
> 00000840.00000bb4::2007/08/06-16:57:27.835 WARN Network Name > <Cluster
> Name>:
> The server for 143.3.16.172.in-addr.arpa. could not be contacted > over
> adapter
> 'Public' to determine whether it accepts DNS registration updates.
> Retrying
> at a later time.
> 00000840.00000bb4::2007/08/06-16:57:27.835 INFO Network Name > <Cluster
> Name>:
> Replaced DNS name <clustername.domain> with IP Address 172.16.3.143 > over
> adapter 'Public'.
> 00000840.00000b08::2007/08/06-16:57:28.679 INFO Network Name: time > until
> next DNS reg: 2007/08/06-22:17:35 (128309122556769715)
> 00000840.00000bb4::2007/08/06-16:58:26.795 WARN Network Name > <Cluster
> Name>:
> Failed to register DNS PTR record 143.3.16.172.in-addr.arpa. for > host
> <clustername.domain> over adapter 'Public', status 1460
> 00000840.00000bb4::2007/08/06-16:58:26.795 INFO Network Name > <Cluster
> Name>:
> Modified DNS name <clustername.domain> with IP Address 172.16.3.143 > over
> adapter 'Public'.
> 00000840.00000b08::2007/08/06-16:58:28.638 INFO Network Name: time > until
> next DNS reg: 2007/08/06-22:17:35 (128309122556769715)
>
> Any help will be greatly appretiated.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Russ Kaufmann [MVP]
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Re: Long failover time...
- References:
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: John Fullbright
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: LOVEBEINGDBA
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Kenny Speer
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Kenny Speer
- Re: Long failover time...
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Re: Long failover time...
- Prev by Date: Re: NLB Unicast vs. Multicast?
- Next by Date: Can you cluster a mount point?
- Previous by thread: Re: Long failover time...
- Next by thread: Re: Long failover time...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|