Re: Broken Printer/Print Share

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

Have you checked the wire to ensure it is not indeed already shared?

Next, clean out WINS, DNS, and your cache for the name. Then try a ping test
to it, it should fail the test and the name resolution!

Cheers,

Rodney R. Fournier

MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner


"ctowndu33" <ctowndu33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5DA52665-43B2-4299-8D3F-CFB0005724CF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We upgraded our Active/Passive print cluster to SP2 over the weekend. It
seems that while doing it, one of the printers lost some sort of
connection
to the share that was created. For instance, after connecting to
\\print\printers and deleting the printer, the share name is still listed
in
\\prnt where you can connect. The problem is when going back to
\\prnt\printers and recreating the printer, you can't share it with the
same
name due to the share already existing. Is there a way (in the registry I
assume) that we can manually remove this share listed on \\print? Thanks
in
advance!


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cluster and attached RAID performance
    ... The write cache issue is inherent to Microsoft clustering. ... Senior Database Administrator ... Microsoft SQL Server MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Cluster and attached RAID performance
    ... Veritas Clustering and SQL are not a particularly good mix. ... the cache coherency issue is endemic to every clustering scenario ... Senior Database Administrator ... Microsoft SQL Server MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Cluster and attached RAID performance
    ... Even if you add Veritas Clustering, I ... Senior Database Administrator ... Microsoft SQL Server MVP ... A PV-220 has no internal cache, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Size of SQLServer databases with indices
    ... it does by no means sounds like a huge database. ... of a table without a clustered index), but in doubt assume clustering ... number over which performance dips considerably. ... where the active data is small enough to fit entirely in cache. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver)
  • Re: Size of SQLServer databases with indices
    ... Is there some practical limit as to who many users SQLServer can ... it does by no means sounds like a huge database. ... > of a table without a clustered index), but in doubt assume clustering ... > where the active data is small enough to fit entirely in cache. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver)