Re: Disk resource and affect the group
- From: "Edwin vMierlo" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:00:44 -0000
I agree, turn off for non-mission-critical,
to add to that; ensure you monitor these services so you are at least
alerted when failure occurs, so you can troubleshoot and fix.
then again, monitoring-alerting [must be | should be] part of any HA
system.....
rgds,
Edwin.
"Rodney R. Fournier" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A4A17DAB-735E-4F9E-8327-5FF806BEF110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Best practice is only turn off affect the group for resources that are notto
mission critical. Example - Exchange Search Service - Disks should always
affect the group.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Dan" <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:40C6EA84-32E0-44D0-9214-8DA4716A7662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey guys,
Is there a best practice as whether or not to enable "affect the group"
on
disk resources? I can see a case for both sides since if an array were
tryingfail it could cause the cluster to keep trying to fail over. Just
resourcesto
decide whether or not to use that setting for the physical disk
I
have on a 2 node active/passive Exchange cluster.
Thanks,
D
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disk resource and affect the group
- From: Rodney R. Fournier
- Re: Disk resource and affect the group
- Prev by Date: Network Load Balancing over WAN Link
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster Serivce Account
- Previous by thread: Network Load Balancing over WAN Link
- Next by thread: Re: Disk resource and affect the group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
