Re: Replace Cluster with Single Server
- From: "Sean P. Donaghey" <sdonaghe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:10:09 -0400
We have already called IBM, and they will not help us. They said to call
Microsoft for the routine.
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:uWsIOBjmGHA.3844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The SAN will be still be around and should be usable. I would call IBM and
ask for assistance.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Sean P. Donaghey" <sdonaghe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uO6fFPimGHA.4700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a W2k cluster that needs to be retired because of outdated
hardware.
It is currently attached to an IBM FAStT 600 SAN. I am setting up a new
Windows Server 2003 box, with dual HBA cards in it, and I am wondering
how do
i get this new server to see the data that existed on the 2 LUNs that
were
originally attached to the cluster, that has all the users files on it?
Will 2003 see the drives in the Disk Management after I bring it up, and
will
I have to reformat the drives? I hope I really do not have to format the
drives, as we need to keep the downtime as small as posible.
Thanks,
Sean
.
- References:
- Replace Cluster with Single Server
- From: Sean P. Donaghey
- Re: Replace Cluster with Single Server
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Replace Cluster with Single Server
- Prev by Date: Re: two-node cluster, the failover doesn't work
- Next by Date: questions about majority node set cluster
- Previous by thread: Re: Replace Cluster with Single Server
- Next by thread: Re: Replace Cluster with Single Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|