Re: MSMQ Reads Fail on Node 2 of a Two Node NLB Cluster
- From: "Mike Rosado [MSFT]" <mikeros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:06:56 -0500
Hi John,
I take it that you've already read this article?
899611 How Message Queuing can function over Network Load Balancing (NLB)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;899611
--
Hope it helps,
________________________________
Mike Rosado | Microsoft Beta Support Engineer | Cluster Technologies
Hours: Mon. ~ Fri. 8:00 AM ~ 5:00 PM Central (GMT-06:00)
====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
====================================================
Of course, this posting wouldn't be complete without a nice, juicy
disclaimer from our lawyers: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no
warranties, and confers no rights. You assume all risk for your use.
© 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
-----Original Message-----
"jad" <jad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AA61E491-F302-43BF-ACB0-C84F85A72683@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I currently have a two node NLB cluster running Windows Server 2003 and
have
implemented MSMQ private queues with the same names on each node. My
applications use the format name Direct=TCP:clusteripaddress to
communicate
to the queues. When the applications send messages to the queues NLB
distributes them equally between the two nodes, however, when the
applications attempt to read from these queues, the reads only seem to be
distributed to node 1 and any messages that had been previously written to
node 2 will remain in these queues. If I stop node 1 then the messages in
these queues on node 2 will be emptied.
Have I missed something in the NLB configuration?
-John
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluster Failovers
- Next by Date: Re: Print cluster post SP1 issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Clstr Servce wont start after changing logon account
- Next by thread: Re: single-node with only one disk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|