Re: With Scenario is the best and why? For a Windows 2003 file server Cluster
- From: "Ryan Sokolowski \(MVP\)" <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:25:51 -0800
Create 3 separate LUNs on the SAN and then present them to the cluster nodes
as separate "disks". You'll have better performance from the storage
perspective...
--
--
Ryan Sokolowski
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP
"A troubleshooter's best tool is the Event Viewer and understanding the
events and messages contained therein."
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"ITSysAdm" <ITSysAdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:upOuwWvQGHA.4608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Server: IBM
Storage: Array on a SAN 600GB
OS: Windows 2003
Cluster: The Quorum is already configured and runnig.
What I want to do?
Create 3 volume(300GB for share Data, 250GB for personnel Data and 50GB
for Profile)
Scenario #1
Do I create 3 physical disk on the SAN(300,250,50), and than create than
on windows/cluster?
Scenario #2
Do I create 1 physical disk on the SAN(600), and than create 3 logical
volume(300,250,50) on windows/cluster?
PS: I want to be able to expand my storage on any vlomume in the future.
Tanks you for the imput
IT Casino
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: With Scenario is the best and why? For a Windows 2003 file server Cluster
- Next by Date: Re: With Scenario is the best and why? For a Windows 2003 file server Cluster
- Previous by thread: With Scenario is the best and why? For a Windows 2003 file server Cluster
- Next by thread: Re: With Scenario is the best and why? For a Windows 2003 file server Cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|