Re: problems with one node
This article might be related. Take a look and let us know.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244331
Regards,
John
"Stefan" <Stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E9BC7ECE-EB7A-45C0-9191-C82D085590F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Last week we reconfigured our network to use subnets. After changing the
subnet on our cluster, I'm experiencing the following problem. Both nodes
seem to function properly, only one node is not able to host any virtual
servers. I'm able to reach and use the resource when i'm in the same vlan,
only other vlan's cannot reach the resource. When i move the group to the
other node everything works fine. I've compared all the settings from both
nodes, and they are as far as i can see exactly the same.
we also have a second cluster which functions perfectly.
The routing between vlan's works well, we've checked that.
hope i'm clear enough
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Conflict: Network Name Resolving - XP Home vs XP Professional
... I've got a large network of PCs that are grouped on subnets. ... running a machine on XP Professional, then I can reference any shared ... the path or resource is unavailable. ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web) - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ... (Pen-Test) - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ... (Security-Basics) - Re: Multi NIC Windows 2003 routing problem
... You cannot use two IP#s from different subnets on the same NIC unless it is ... > All network traffic destined for the 192.168.20.x and 192.168.90.x should ... (still does, but that server has to go, for obvious reasons). ... >> Microsoft Windows XP - Multihoming Considerations ... (microsoft.public.win2000.networking) - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ... (Pen-Test) |
|