RE: Cluster diagnostics tool test fails

Mike,

Thanks for your comments.

At first I didn't had private NIC only for private traffic, but I got advice
from otherwhere how it should be. Also from the same place I got a message
that it might be because of VMWare. As I told I'm running this on my test
system in WMVware ESX server.

After this message I wonder that it is not so important, because failover is
working fine. So now I have installed the E2003 to that and still it works :)

Have a nice Wednesday !
--
..-Petri-.

"Mike Rosado [MSFT]" wrote:

> Hi Petri,
>
> Here's how the code is interpreted.
>
> # for hex 0x80070005 / decimal -2147024891
> # Access is denied.
> E_ACCESSDENIED
> # General access denied error
>
> Are the Private Heartbeat NICs connected to a switch, dumb hub or
> cross-over cable? If they are connected to a switch, then I would
> suggested using a dumb hub or cross-over cable to see if you experience the
> same behavior.
>
> Is the Public NIC configured for All Communications and Private Heartbeat
> NIC for Internal Communication Only?
>
> --------------------
> Hope this helps,
> Mike Rosado
> Windows 2000 MCSE + MCDBA
> Microsoft Enterprise Platform Support
> Windows NT/2000/2003 Cluster Technologies
>
> ====================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> ====================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> <http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> > From: <Petri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Cluster diagnostics tool test fails
> > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:06:10 -0800
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have two node cluster on W2003 platform. Right after installation I ran
> > the Cluster Diagnostic tool to check that I can install E2003 to that
> system.
> > This is my test system before the production, but still.
> >
> > When the node 1 is active and I'm running the tool against cluster it
> > reports for me:
> >
> > Adding info for connection #0 of node server1. Physical
> > address=00-11-22-33-44-55
> > Adding info for connection #0 of node server1. Physical
> > address=00-11-22-33-44-66
> > Status=-2147024891("80070005H) In Loop. Error value=-2147024891 returned
> > from MiscEnumerateConnection(autosniff.cpp@262)
> > Status=-2147024891("80070005H) Failed to get Mac Addresses for cluster :
> > mycluster, Ret: -2147024891. (autosniff.cpp@739)
> >
> > When the another node is active then I get the same error on there as
> well.
> > Only difference is that server1 is server2 at then and the MAC addresses
> are
> > different.
> >
> > Should I worry of this ?
> >
> > .-Petri-.
> >
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Delegation between .Net web app and SQL Server
    ... separate DNS name. ... So if your server is called X, ... and y.y.y.y is the IP address of the private IP addressed NIC on ... > addresses on the internal nics. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
  • Re: Change structure Question fo SBS2000
    ... You really want two nics still in the server ... Then a second one with a different private IP going to the router. ... This LAN ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Windows 2003 cluster and networking
    ... Changing the mask has resolved my issue. ... is there a default gateway configured on your private nic's? ... The private nics are ... ensure the network and network mask are not overlapping with your public ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)
  • Re: Heartbeat problem
    ... You mention about disabling NetBIOS support on the NIC. ... Windows NT/2000/2003 Cluster Technologies ... > This is a good point but i have public first then private... ... >> Suspect it's the Binding Order of the NICs, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)