Re: When adding 2nd node, unable to see shared drives



Are you booting off the SAN or do you have your boot/system disk on the same
bus as your shared storage?

I would troubleshoot this by uninstalling cluster completely on all nodes
and verify that each cluster node can access the shared storage. Power down
Node2 and leave Node1 up and running. With Node1 up, make sure you have
access to the shared storage and create a partition (if necessary) and copy
some data to the disk. Next, power down Node1 and power up Node2 and see if
you can access the data on this partition (you might need to mount it in
order to access the data). If you do not see the partition or the data,
something is screwed up in your SAN (zoning/masking). If you can access the
data without issue, cluster should be able to detect your shared storage
properly.

Regards,
John


"Isaac Story" <IsaacStory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5F7C84F5-9554-4091-A0F6-BDE2A79F1CF7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I actually had seen that. I tried the work around (and applied SP1) and I
was
> able to create the cluster, but as they warned in the KB article, if the
> drives are accessing properly the cluster will not failover. And sure
enough
> it does not. I did check to make sure that the drives are set up the same
on
> both servers (Same bus, Port, TID, and LUN numbers on each server). I have
> inserted what results in the cluster srv log. It is still not seeing valid
> partitions on one of the hosts and cannot see the quorum. It states that
it
> had to create a local "dummy" quorum. Am I still missing something??
>
> Found SCSI disk '\\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0' on Bus '0' and Port '0'; at TID '0'
and
> LUN '2' (hr=00000000, {05AA0768-5F49-49CD-AFDC-96F9D51802D4},
> {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}, 1, 1, 1), (null)
>
> Physical disk PHYSICALDRIVE0 has signature 0. (hr=00000000,
> {05AA0768-5F49-49CD-AFDC-96F9D51802D4},
> {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}, 1, 1, 1), (null)
>
> The physical disk '\\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0' does not have any partitions and
will
> not be managed (hr=0x000001, {05AA0768-5F49-49CD-AFDC-96F9D51802D4},
> {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}, 1, 1, 1), (null)
>
> "John Toner [MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Have you seen this KB article?
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/331801
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> > "Isaac Story" <IsaacStory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:D33A2DA4-E1F0-434C-8E52-A7C3164A9D59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > I am fairly new to clustering and there is an issue I am having when
> > adding
> > > subsequent nodes after the first one while the first node is still up
and
> > > running. Due to the "shared nothing" model that restricts shared
storage
> > > access to one host, when I bring the second node up, the drives I need
on
> > the
> > > SAN show up as unreadable. As a result, adding the second node fails
> > because
> > > it cannot see the shared quorum drive nor the shared data drive. I
have
> > seen
> > > several people say this is normal behavior, yet it is preventing me
from
> > > setting up multi-node clustering. Am I missing something here???
> > >
> > > My hardware setup is as follows:
> > >
> > > IBM HS20 Blades connected to a Hitachi 9570V through a Brocade fabric.
All
> > > hosts are running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise.
> >
> >
> >


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2 large hard drive questions
    ... 4K cluster size is fine for windows partition. ... would have on these big drives. ... I noticed that Disk Manager in Windows XP SP2 reports the disk as ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Cluster size ? - experience
    ... FAT) will grow whenever you reduce the cluster size because it needs to have ... couple of times by formatting a few new drives of different sizes with 2K ... also thinking of arranging my old " Archive partition" by size. ... So to not waste so ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Resizing FAT partitions
    ... full cluster, and are thus part of the volume, but unused. ... determining the max amount of space to partition on a given drive. ... each type of FAT with a fixed table used for floppies. ... not be able to copy to such small drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: how to calculate correctly the cluster size
    ... > are the smallest cluster size possible in the partition size. ... There exists an algorithm for defragmenting a drive that only needs to ... It's the whole capacity vs bandwidth issue on hard drives, ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • RE: Cloned XP Professional boot partition - and lost the login prompt
    ... > active boot partition to a new hard drive using Norton Ghost, ... > and did a bitwise comparison of the partition on both drives. ... If you have a failed cluster the same cluster would be empty on the cloned partition i.e. a bitwise comparison would be passed. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)