Re: Question: Configuration of a Direct Connect SCSI Cluster.
- From: "Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:17:27 -0600
"DIAN_TECH" <DIANTECH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:154C9C3B-9DA4-4E42-ADCC-1D4706DA12AA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am looking at deploying two W2003 "Enterprise" Edition servers connected
> locally to a shared Disk system via SCSI. The operational scenerio is to
> introduce load balancing in the cluster so one application run on one
> server
> and another application on the other server. In the event of failure the
> failed application would be failover onto the other server.
>
> My question is in order to allow both servers to run in parallel with
> failover.
> Would I need to create a separate Cluster Group for each application in
> order to allow independant access to the application data drives located
> on
> shared storage ??
Each application would require its own cluster group with its own IP
resource, network name resource, and physical disk (assuming it needs
storage) resource. They each need their own cluster group so they can fail
over separately without impacting each other.
--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Website
http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp - New Blog
http://spaces.msn.com/members/russkaufmann - Old Blog
.
- References:
- Question: Configuration of a Direct Connect SCSI Cluster.
- From: DIAN_TECH
- Question: Configuration of a Direct Connect SCSI Cluster.
- Prev by Date: Access Denied when administering cluster
- Next by Date: Re: Node down
- Previous by thread: Question: Configuration of a Direct Connect SCSI Cluster.
- Next by thread: Access Denied when administering cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|