Re: Folks questioning MS NLB
- From: "Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:36:56 -0600
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:urHA$MinFHA.1968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Personally, I would choice hardware over software any day.
>
> But it really depends on what you are using it for. SPS hate NLB, ISA 2004
> loves it. Websites can go either way and performance might be better with
> hardware.
SPS with SSL hates hardware, but only because you have to put the actual
certificates on the individual nodes.
In most cases, I prefer hardware for load balancing so long as it can also
provide SSL acceleration.
--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Website
http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp - New Blog
http://spaces.msn.com/members/russkaufmann - Old Blog
.
- References:
- Folks questioning MS NLB
- From: Marlon Brown
- Re: Folks questioning MS NLB
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Folks questioning MS NLB
- Prev by Date: RE: Dive configuration on new cluster
- Next by Date: Re: Dive configuration on new cluster
- Previous by thread: Re: Folks questioning MS NLB
- Next by thread: problems with VSS mount point failover
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|