Re: Moving to a New SAN
From: Pat Hall (PatHall_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Cluster groups and failover"
- Previous message: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Cluster groups and failover"
- In reply to: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Next in thread: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Reply: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Reply: John Toner [MVP]: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:35:02 -0800
We have to increase the size of the Quorum disk? I don't understand why when
we use the EMC SAN a 16.5 GB is large enough but on an IBM SAN we need a much
larger Quorum (500 MB).
"Russ Kaufmann" wrote:
> "Pat Hall" <PatHall@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A861D454-65E9-4788-B59B-A1FAAEE38E3C@microsoft.com...
> > We are planning on moving our SQL Cluster (Win2k3 active/passive) using
> > MSCS
> > from an EMC SAN to an IBM SAN (FastT). 2 questions:
> > 1) Can the Quorum disk
> > stay
> > at 16.5 MB like it is on the EMC SAN or do we need to increase the size to
> > the 500 MB as recommended? The only thing on that drive is the cluster
> > info.
>
> I would recommend changing it on the new SAN.
>
> > 2) Have looked a sever posts and am concerned that our
> > plans
> > may not work like we think. We are going to:
> > a) Make sure the nightly
> > backup
> > ran for each server
> > b) Shut down the servers and install an extra HBA in each
>
> It may be easier to just add the new switches for the new SAN into the
> fabric rather than adding a new HBA. With both SAN devices in the same
> fabric, it won't require cracking the server cases.
>
> > c) Bring the servers up and verify that they can see the
> > correct LUNs
>
> If you add the SAN to the fabric, all you will need to do is rescan for
> drives in disk management, assuming the proper WWNs are added to make the
> new LUNs visible to the nodes.
>
> > d) Shut down the services on each machines
>
> No need to do this unless you are talking about services that are locking
> files.
>
> > e) Copy the files from their current EMC LUN to the IBM LUN (I'd like to
> > do
> > a mirror and then break, we will see which works best, robocopy is our
> > fallback).
>
> I have done both. I like the Mirror and break solution.
>
> > f) Break mirrors (if we do it via mirroring)
> > g) Change drive letters so the IBM LUN now has the one previously used by
> > the EMC drive
> > h) Bring up the services and make sure that everything comes up properly.
> >
> > Are we going to have problems?
>
> The quorum is easiest to move by using the GUI and changing from the drive
> on the EMC to the IBM. If yuo are trying to get to the letter Q (EMC has
> Q:), then I would use one of the LUNs on the IBM as a temp home for the
> quorum and move it there, remove the disk resource for the Q: and then
> reletter it in the OS, and then create a new Q: disk resource on the IBM and
> move from the temporary home to the new Q:.
>
>
>
- Next message: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Cluster groups and failover"
- Previous message: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Cluster groups and failover"
- In reply to: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Next in thread: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Reply: Russ Kaufmann: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Reply: John Toner [MVP]: "Re: Moving to a New SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|