Re: 2003 Enterprise Storage Edition Cluster
From: Steve (aspnetgeek_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Previous message: fabrizioa: "Problem Windows 2003 Cluster"
- In reply to: Jonathan E. Schneeweis: "2003 Enterprise Storage Edition Cluster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:09:02 -0400
Are your Windows Shares configured as clustered resources or are the shares
just local to the one node? These shares have to be Clustered resources
along with having an also need to have an IPAddress tied to this share.
I've setup a 4-node cluster cluster running DFS, NAS and things failover w/o
issues.
Steve
"Jonathan E. Schneeweis" <jonathan_schneeweis@merck.com> wrote in message
news:0abe01c49bf3$efceeb50$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> Greetings Everyone,
>
> I'm a cluster newbie so please bear with me! I'm
> administrating a 2003 Enterprise Storage Edition
> Active/Passive Cluster that consists of two nodes. But,
> as I'm part of a large Enterprise network I do not
> administrate the domain controllers to which these cluster
> nodes and their cluster name belongs.
>
> I have an issue with windows clients accessing my DFS and
> CIFS share clustered resources following a failover. When
> everything is up and running I can ping each node
> separately and pinging the cluster name pings the active
> node. And immediately following a failover (or a "Move
> group" clients connected to the shares continue to
> successfully access the shares via the second node fine.
> But after a couple minutes all clients lose access to the
> shares, their Windows Explorer's hang, and I am no longer
> able to ping the cluster name. But I can ping both nodes.
>
> The cluster name, and the nodes, all have static IPs and
> are all registered in the DNS server.
>
> Any thoughts?!? I'm at a loss.
>
> Thanks!
> Jonathan
- Previous message: fabrizioa: "Problem Windows 2003 Cluster"
- In reply to: Jonathan E. Schneeweis: "2003 Enterprise Storage Edition Cluster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
