RE: NLB Print servers
From: Greg Page (gpage_at_nospam.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/04/04
- Next message: SME: "RE: Moving cluster to new hardware"
- Previous message: Farley Louie: "Moving cluster to new hardware"
- In reply to: Rajeev: "RE: NLB Print servers"
- Next in thread: Paolo P.: "Re: NLB Print servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:23:29 GMT
absolutly. there is a print spooler resource type for doing print spoolers,
in fact.
This message is provided as is and does not imply any warranty or gaurantee
of support of any kind. Microsoft, the person providing the advice, nor any
of Microsoft's and posters subsidiaries, friends, pets, children or
acquaintenances will be held in any way liable for following any advice
contained herein.
--------------------
>Thread-Topic: NLB Print servers
>thread-index: AcQCCZXuW2KmU1zLROu99W6WWrKAJA==
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>From: =?Utf-8?B?UmFqZWV2?= <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>References: <76861CC8-CEC4-4FF2-80A3-6A7AB6767898@microsoft.com>
<nG90GvfAEHA.3552@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
>Subject: RE: NLB Print servers
>Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:56:06 -0800
>Lines: 37
>Message-ID: <23C6E952-55CD-4F44-82E8-1394580B7D2D@microsoft.com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Utf-8"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>Importance: normal
>Priority: normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering:2851
>NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>
>Is it possible to use W2K3 clustering to not only provide failover, but
also to load balance a print environment?
----- Greg Page wrote: -----
you can do it, but it won't work very well. MS will not support it and
you
won't like the results.
This message is provided as is and does not imply any warranty or
gaurantee
of support of any kind. Microsoft, the person providing the advice,
nor any
of Microsoft's and posters subsidiaries, friends, pets, children or
acquaintenances will be held in any way liable for following any
advice
contained herein.
--------------------
>Thread-Topic: NLB Print servers
>thread-index: AcQBWC7VeA4pOdwzSIO2a0UNP7ycTQ==
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>From: =?Utf-8?B?UmFqZWV2?=
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>>Subject: NLB Print servers
>Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:46:12 -0800
>Lines: 1
>Message-ID:
<76861CC8-CEC4-4FF2-80A3-6A7AB6767898@microsoft.com>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Utf-8"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>Importance: normal
>Priority: normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering:2821
>NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering
>>Is this possible? My goal is to scale out the availability of our
print
servers so that we can add additional servers when the load on the
other
bcoems too high. We plan to do this with Windows Server 2003. Thanks
>
>
- Next message: SME: "RE: Moving cluster to new hardware"
- Previous message: Farley Louie: "Moving cluster to new hardware"
- In reply to: Rajeev: "RE: NLB Print servers"
- Next in thread: Paolo P.: "Re: NLB Print servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
