Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- From: Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:58:12 +0000 (UTC)
Hello Phillip,
Maybe i understand you not correct, but the FSMOs are not needed for the logon process, so it doesn't matter if the DC holding them is not available. For logon at least a DC and DNS server is needed, when universal groups are used also a Global catalog server. Otherwise they will logon with cached credentials onj th local machine.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
"iautran" <iautran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mn.3cd77d97c254cab5.97978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But this is not what I have read about the "DC Locator" process ...Becuase it is better than not doing it. The Client most likely will
And so why does Microsoft tell us to configure two DNS DC servers in
the DNS configuration of each client ?
log in with a cached account,..just like it would do if you started it
up without the LAN cable plugged in. The second DNS entry would give
the client the ability to still resolve names in a more general sense.
The Client would be "aware" that the other DC existed because it would
be seen in the DNS Zone,...but the remaining DC just cannot do the
jobs of the other DC because it just does not have the same FSMO
Roles.
Instead of testing by shutting down the first DC,...test by shutting
down the second DC,...you will notice that it will almost not even be
noticed (depending on the FSMO Roles it had).
Yes I have seen the articals that make it all sound so "rosey" but in
pactice it has never seemed to be so rosey when tried.
Now everything changes again when you get into Sites with multiple DCs
where you have a DC at each Site. The AD Sites are designed so that
all the Clients in a Site will use the DC within their own Site
regardless of the FSMO roles it has.
So I'm not going to claim to know every little detail of how and why
it behaves the way it does,...but I do know that smooth transparent DC
fail-over just does not happen.
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- From: Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]
- Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- References:
- Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- Next by Date: Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- Next by thread: Re: Secondary (backup) domain controller not working ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|