Re: Problem After Defining Static RPC Port

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



To resolve this, our Security people allowed port 1026 to be open to the DCs
at the firewall, along with the already open 1025. The interesting thing is
that all four of the new DCs eventually started listening on port 1025, just
like the old DCs on the other subnet.

I wish we could get them to open a larger range of ports for RPC, but that
isn't going to happen. So far this has worked, though.

Thanks.

"Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]" wrote:

Check out an article I have on dc's and firewalls. I would specifically
define any ports to verify full connectivity. Don't just assume something
is going to stay on the same port, you are just asking for wierd things to
happen.

http://www.pbbergs.com/windows/articles.htm
Select Firewall Ports Needed for Replication

--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4

http://www.pbbergs.com

Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"Baboon" <Baboon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:68F0736F-3185-45FB-A866-BD203C596D8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have had 4 DCs behind a firewall in a particular subnet for a few
years.
RPC communcation from clients always seems to go to

port 1025 even though a static port isn't set in the servers' Registry.
For
that reason, port 1025 is open in the firewall to the

DCs, along with port 135 and the other usual AD ports. We recently added
new DCs to a different subnet (same site) behind another

firewall using the same rules. For whatever reason, clients are tring to
use port 1026 on the new DCs for RPC communication and

being denied at the firewall. (The DCs on both subnets have no trouble
replicating because pretty much every port is open between

their 2 subnets.)

To hopefully get around this problem, I created the TCP/IP Port Registry
dword value of 1025 in \NTDS\Parameters per several KB

articles. Once I made that change, I began to see client connections to
that port. (I did this on only one DC as a test.) The

problem is that after a reboot to enable the change, I get a warning entry
in the Directory Services log:
*************************************************
Event ID 1310
Active Directory could not use the following RPC protocol sequence.
RPC protocol sequence:
ncacn_ip_tcp...........
............Error value:
1740 The endpoint is a duplicate.
*************************************************
I checked to confirm that the server wasn't listening on port 1025
beforehand so I'm not sure what the error means. I rebooted a

second time, but the error showed up again after the reboot. When I run
"repadmin /replsummary", I see no errors for that DC.

When I run "rpcdump /s /i", the results look exactly the same as when I
run
it on a different DC. Does anyone have any ideas why

it get this error?

I wish I could say that's my only question, but it got me wondering why
the
DCs in one subnet are having the endpoint mapper

direct clients to port 1025, but on the other subnet it directs clients to
port 1026. (All are running Windows 2003 with SP2.)

Also, I'm surprised that the endpoint mapper directs them to the same port
each time, since I thought those ports were dynamic.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: sysvol replication breaks when IPSec running between DCs & firewal
    ... Also have a look here about UDP port 500: ... open the firewall for ports required by IPSec, ... We have two root DCs and three child domain DCs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Sharing stopped workin, cannot connect out
    ... I do not think simply stopping the XP firewall is sufficient. ... When I run the port scan from the XP on the XP it says that port 21, ... The 172.16.0.0/12 private network can be interpreted ... XBox on the same subnet but only this particular XP Home that have this ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: DMZ and file sharing
    ... original poster is not in that zone as he refers to a "port", presumably a real DMzone is a different subnet and/or IP range rather than a fowarded/open "port"? ... firewall does indeed have an additional physical port which is another ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Adding firewall tomorrow - am I doing this right?
    ... Disconnect the cable from the wan card. ... Plug it into the incoming port on the firewall device and the then connect ... server and subnet Maskthat match the subnet of ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] scanning...
    ... > ports are allowed through the firewall for each host... ... > cant see the port... ... > subnet and go ... > do network discovery and even seems that it will do so via whatever port you ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)