Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Big Passeron <BigPasseron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:01 -0800
A little update.
I've found a software (Privilege Manager from BeyondTrust) that seems to be
exactly what I was looking for.
It's based on Group Policy and permits sw installation and usage to normal
users, assuming that installers or executables are located inside specific
folders or are digital signed by a certain manufacture.
At the moment I'm trying the trial version, but until now I feel really
satisfied.
Thanks for your help and please let me know should you have further advices.
Cheers
"Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]" wrote:
Correct..
--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
http://www.pbbergs.com
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Big Passeron" <BigPasseron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6B6D49FA-1598-4312-AB71-841FDFF6E065@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So there'no way on earth to permit software's installation when
preauthorized, while blocking all other installations?
"Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]" wrote:
Most times they need to be an admin when installing complex software and
there is no way around it unless you have a push program such as SMS
which
in this situation isn't possible.
--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
http://www.pbbergs.com
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Big Passeron" <BigPasseron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2F238C3F-2180-473C-A51A-1FC1AC18F483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Florian, I got another question.
Now part of our users belongs to "Network Configuration Operators"
groups.
However, some people need to uninstall old versions of our own
softwares
and
install the new ones.
Very often it happens like this:
A user is abroad, when he suddendly realizes that the SW he's using has
a
bug to be fixed ASAP.
So our programmers prepare a new version to be installed and send it to
him.
Unfortunately, not having admin privileges, installation will be
denied.
So basically, the chance to permit just the installation of our
softwares
is
mandatory.
How can I accomplish this goal?
"Florian Frommherz [MVP]" wrote:
Howdie!
Big Passeron wrote:
Our users need sometimes to change IP settings since they're
engineers,
using our own SW tools that work in conjunction with some HW devices
we
produce.
To be able to communicate with these measurement devices every
engineer,
when performing measurements abroad, needs to set some network
parameters.
All that said, will this people still able to make these
modifications
and
also set up (for example) a connection to access a Wlan (and tasks
like
these) once inside an hotel?
What standard TCP/IP network configuration and WLAN concerns, putting
the users into the Network Configuration Operators group (not that
group
is there on Windows XP and above), you should be okay.
As far as the hardware devices go - I'm not sure if you can handle
programmers and devices attached to the serial port then and whether
the
dev tools all work after that. That's the part you'd have to test on a
sample machine.
Cheers,
Florian
--
Microsoft MVP - Group Policy
eMail: prename [at] frickelsoft [dot] net.
blog: http://www.frickelsoft.net/blog.
Maillist (german):
http://frickelsoft.net/cms/index.php?page=mailingliste
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- References:
- Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Big Passeron
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Florian Frommherz [MVP]
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Big Passeron
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Florian Frommherz [MVP]
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Big Passeron
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Big Passeron
- Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- From: Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]
- Least privilege vs efficiency
- Prev by Date: Re: Enforce user account restrictions policy
- Next by Date: Replacing a CA server
- Previous by thread: Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- Next by thread: Re: Least privilege vs efficiency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|