Re: whats the difference...
- From: "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:27:17 -0500
Bill <Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
between the Everyone group, and the Authenticated Users group? is a
share more secure when given to Authenticated Users as apposed to the
Everyone group?
Hi - "everyone" is the least secure.
http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/23581/should-you-use-the-authenticated-users-group.html
may help describe the difference.
For your users' data folders, it's best to use neither, in my opinion. Use
your own AD security groups ("Company Users," "Management," "Accounting,"
etc.)
However, for *share* permissions, I think I'm not alone in using "everyone"
and granting it full control - because I use NTFS permissions to lock down
the folders themselves.
.
- References:
- whats the difference...
- From: Bill
- whats the difference...
- Prev by Date: Re: GPO Not Being Applied
- Next by Date: Re: whats the difference...
- Previous by thread: whats the difference...
- Next by thread: Re: whats the difference...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|