Re: Active Directory - Virtualization for performance

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



Review http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888794 regarding virtualized
installations of AD domain controllers.
In general, the recommendation is to host AD on separate servers -
co-locating it with other apps/services might introduce
performance/compatibility issues and is likely complicate troubleshooting in
case of problems. What range of response times do your applications need
that you are concerned about LAN latency?
Do you know what mechanism is used by your apps to access AD? Do you have
any influence on their design? If so, you should take into consideration
info included in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms806997.aspx

hth
Marcin

"flcgil" <flcgil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9F350F46-D2C2-4A42-9696-6866A29FF57D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am working on the design of a new environment where we are going to have
a
heavy load of access from the applications to the AD Server. In this
scenario, what are the mechanisms/solutions to get a high throughput?

I was wondering if we could make the AD Server available in the same
physical machine of the Application Server, using virtualization (AD and
the
Application Server run on different virtual machines). In this
configuration,
any access to the AD would not suffer the latency overhead of the LAN bus.
Does anyone have any information about this virtualization approach? Any
other suggestions to get the highest possible throughput?

Thanks



.



Relevant Pages

  • [SLE] OT: Speaking of VMware.....
    ... EMC TO ACQUIRE VMware, ... ADVANCING CONVERGENCE OF SERVER AND ... STORAGE VIRTUALIZATION ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: User licensing
    ... server, and then inside the Virtual Server create a couple of ... Without virtualization, you could simply buy 10 workstations, ... Citrix licensing is per concurrent session, ... This would allow an employee to log in to ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: Running SBS 2003 on a virtual server?
    ... I am hopeful there is a GUI with Hyper-V Server if I go that direction. ... Budget is an issue so going with Hyper-V Server has to be a consideration because it saves buying a copy of Server 2008 Standard, ... Finally, because I plan to go from SBS 2003 to SBS 2003 to start, does anyone know if Jeff's migration kit works all right migrating to a virtual SBS 2003? ... Frankly, I'm not about to mess with virtualization without the GUI to manage it, at this point. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Using Hyper-V with Windows Small Business Server 2008
    ... Virtual Server running or VMware. ... I use the virtual machines to host ... Only in the later case is the real Virtualization technology making the most ... you run the hardware as Windows Hyper-V Server and virtualise SBS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: User licensing
    ... you can run Virtual Server on a Windows 2003 ... Without virtualization, you could simply buy 10 workstations, ... Citrix licensing is per concurrent session, ... This would allow an employee to log in to ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)