Re: Empty Sites in AD
- From: Meinolf Weber <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
Hello DRATliff,
You can also leave them there. Personally i prefer always clean overviews and only needed settings and not old one's.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
Thanks Meinolf,
That's what I thought. Any harm in leaving these empty sites?
"Meinolf Weber" wrote:
Hello DRATliff,
AD Sites and services is used to point DC's to a specific
site/subnet, so that authentication from clients in that site choose
first the DC which is located in the site/subnet and if that one is
not available tries another DC. If not longer in use you can delete
it.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
Greetings,
I'm in the process of cleaning up and redesigning my company's AD
typology, and one thing that I haven't found a suitable answer for
is, what to do with Sites that no longer contain a DC? Technically,
there is a physical branch office for a given Site, but DCs and
Subnets have all been moved elsewhere (Typically, any site with less
than 50 users and no secure computer room).
any reason for me to leave these empty sites in Sites and Services,
or is it safe to clean up?
Thanks in advance,
Dave Ratliff
.
- References:
- Re: Empty Sites in AD
- From: DRATliff
- Re: Empty Sites in AD
- Prev by Date: Active Directory and SQL Membership Provider Based Authentication and DMZ
- Next by Date: Re: ADPrep /forestprep failed 2000 to 2003 r2
- Previous by thread: Re: Empty Sites in AD
- Next by thread: Re: Empty Sites in AD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
