Re: simple AD DNS question
- From: ctvader <jeff.swift@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:27:44 -0700
On Oct 2, 2:49 pm, "Phillip Drummond" <w...@xxxxx> wrote:
thank you
"Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ff16fb665ca0f8c9d34b2d5530a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Phillip,
Preferred itself, second the redundant DNS.
Also have a look here:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825036
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
2 domain controllers... where should they each look for primary and
secondary dns servers?
example, should the first DC look at itself for dns, with no
secondary? snd the second dc look at the 1st dc for primary dns and
itself for secondary?
what is best practice here?
thanks- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Heres another point of view - we had an MS engineer a year ago to do
an ADRAP and one of the recomendation was to point all the DC's to the
same DNS server to help troubleshoot/pinpoint DNS issues should they
crop up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: simple AD DNS question
- From: Phillip Drummond
- Re: simple AD DNS question
- References:
- simple AD DNS question
- From: Phillip Drummond
- Re: simple AD DNS question
- From: Meinolf Weber
- Re: simple AD DNS question
- From: Phillip Drummond
- simple AD DNS question
- Prev by Date: Re: The backup file contains unrecognized data and cannot be used
- Next by Date: Re: Slow XP logon times
- Previous by thread: Re: simple AD DNS question
- Next by thread: Re: simple AD DNS question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|