Re: redundant time source
- From: "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:23:19 +0200
Hello,
at the end, if all computers are exactly at the same time (atomic clock), there isn't any issue.
Issues about time start when there is more than 5 minutes lag (kerberos replay protection)
It may also make debug harder if there is more than 30 seconds lags.
The goal is to get everyone at the same time, and the good time is event better !
--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
"Bentley" <Bentley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:193BE2D1-28A6-42FB-9036-3CF894D046AC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are there any problems with having a secondary time source in a windows 2003
forest?
One of the agencies we support wants to point a couple domain member servers
to a 'netclock' device that is co-located rather than have them point to the
pdc emulator, which is in another building.
I do not want to point the pdc emulator to this device (it currently points
to naval observatory).
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
.
- Prev by Date: Re: AD <Automatically generated> site replication links
- Next by Date: Re: Email address are not populating after account creation
- Previous by thread: need help with a couple of question
- Next by thread: Re: redundant time source
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
