Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Inte
- From: David Dixon <DavidDixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:07:00 -0700
Thanks Joe, that is just the type of info I was looking for!
"Joe Kaplan" wrote:
LDAP is an ugly solution on the public internet, as it may require drilling.
holes in your firewall to allow an external organization to perform LDAP
operations against your directory. It also exposes a much larger surface
area of your directory than you really want or need to, as once you have
opened the firewall up for LDAP, the external entity can execute ANY LDAP
query, not just LDAP binds for authentication. Also, it is often difficult
to get different technology stacks to talk to different LDAP directories as
they all work a little differently and you can end up in a sticky
integration mess.
These federated authentication protocols are designed to address these
issues by using "web" standards like XML, PKI and HTTP to perform the
protocol level integration and broker the trust between entities. They are
designed just to perform the operations appropriate to the use case
(authenticating users across organizational boundaries and providing limited
sets of information about those users to business partners), so they don't
expose a large, scary surface area.
People use LDAP all the time for doing authentication, but it is an ugly
solution outside the firewall and across organizational boundaries.
Joe K.
--
Joe Kaplan-MS MVP Directory Services Programming
Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services Programming"
http://www.directoryprogramming.net
--
"David Dixon" <DavidDixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D32F43A5-64CD-45BC-B09E-AF841046D9C7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the information Joe, your response was really helpful to me!
Any
thoughts on why Microsoft does not recommend using LDAP for AD
authentication?
Thanks again!
"Joe Kaplan" wrote:
I would probably suggest using ADFS as your authentication technology to
provide this kind of access. It gives you a ton of flexibility with
allowing acess to web apps on the public internet to both your own
employees
and outside users.
If you need a secondary authentication store for external users, ADAM
works
well for this. ADAM also integrates with ADFS nicely, so you can work
that
into your solution.
If you need to access an externally hosted application and want to
authenticate using your own identities, ADFS can work quite well for this
too. Your external vendor would also need an ADFS infrastructure and
would
need to modify the app to work with ADFS (which may or may not be a big
deal), but this can work. This is actually the primary mechanism our
company uses for integrating identity with external vendor apps.
There is a fair amount to study to get up to speed with ADFS, but MS has
written some decents docs. The Deployment Guide is lengthy, but pretty
thorough.
Joe K.
--
Joe Kaplan-MS MVP Directory Services Programming
Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services
Programming"
http://www.directoryprogramming.net
--
"David Dixon" <DavidDixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6289AF49-64C0-4356-9D61-4B3BEB415DB6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My organization is beginning to look at providing a segment of the user
population (not employees) access to certain web apps and data. These
users
are not physically in our offices, hence we would need to build a
secure
method to allow them to access these resources via the Internet. We
also
have
at least one outsourced solution (which provides online discussion
capabilities) that we want to control access to as well (preferably
using
AD
authentication). What I mean by control access is that we need to
ensure
that
only approved and valid users defined by us (i.e. are in AD) are
allowed
to
access it.
That being said, here are my questions:
1) Is it generally a good idea to build an authentication solution that
uses
our internal AD for authentication? Would ADAM be a viable option?
2) For the outsourced scenario, would it be feasible to expect that we
could
provide a link to the outsourced site from a portal and force users to
authenticate through the portal (using our internal AD for
authentication)
prior to accessing the outsourced site?
3) I am hearing that the vendor of the outsourced solution is pushing
LDAP
as a means to allow us to use our AD accounts for authentication
purposes.
I
have heard that generally Microsoft does not recommend using LDAP for
authentication against AD. Is this true and if so, what are the primary
reasons?
I am definitely knowledgeable of the Microsoft Platform and AD, but I
am
far
from a guru in this arena. Any feedback on my questions or pointers to
additional info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
- References:
- Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Internet
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Inte
- From: David Dixon
- Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Inte
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Internet
- Prev by Date: Find Dialog Box error in Active Directory
- Next by Date: Re: How to gain access to local files in a remote desktop session
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommended strategy for providing access to web apps via Inte
- Next by thread: Re: HOW TO: Install and Use the Drive Share Utility in Windows 2000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|