Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: "Jorge Silva" <jorgesilva_pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:28:36 -0000
Hi Joe
First of all, let me say that the answer is based in common configuration, Gonzo didn't specify any specific configuration, so I think it's fair to give a common DNS configuration for a common scenario.
No it doesn't. In fact in some situations it absolutely should not.
IMO: Yes it does, if not why you should Run DNS on that server, if you don't plan to take advantage of DNS don't install it on the DC. If my DNS server is updated why should I query another one when I have everything I need locally? Of course when you introduce a new DC/DNS on the domain, during dcpromo you should use another updated DNS server in the primary DNS NIC configuration, but after everything is replicated you should point the server again to it self. There're other specific types of configuration that you can take advantage of querying other DNS server than locally, but again this is a common scenario not specific, or maybe I miss something in Gonzo's post.
I am really not sure where you came up with this. If you got it from MSFT docs, point me at them so I can get them removed/corrected.
LOL. I think I shouldn't even bother to respond this one obviously. I don't think so.
Pointing at another DC is not definitely a wrong configuration. It could be, but isn't necessarily. Depends on the DNS configuration.
According with general/normal configuration, IMO it is. So again: . If my DNS server is updated why should I query another one when I have everything I need locally?
It is possible the local records are wrong. Incorrect records are worse than no records because incorrect records do not cause a secondary lookup.
Agree, you should correct that, but after correction made, point the server to it self again.
--
I hope that the information above helps you.
Have a Nice day.
Jorge Silva
MCSE
"Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Oct%23wl2UHHA.3652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The DC/DNS Always must point to itself in preferred DNS..
No it doesn't. In fact in some situations it absolutely should not.
> DCs weren't made to be rebooted
I am really not sure where you came up with this. If you got it from MSFT docs, point me at them so I can get them removed/corrected.
> I don't see ANY reason to do a wrong configuration just
> because you need a reboot from time to time.
Pointing at another DC is not definitely a wrong configuration. It could be, but isn't necessarily. Depends on the DNS configuration.
> Why should the DC look for DNS queries in
> another DNS when that DC has the DNS locally? No sense.
It is possible the local records are wrong. Incorrect records are worse than no records because incorrect records do not cause a secondary lookup.
joe
--
Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services
Author of O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition
www.joeware.net
---O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition now available---
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Jorge Silva wrote:Hi
The DC/DNS Always must point to itself in preferred DNS. Place the secondary DNS server pointing to an existing one, so when the DC starts up, if the DNS service starts later then AD, the server can look for the secondary DNS.
BTW: DCs weren't made to be rebooted, however sometimes is needed, but I don't see ANY reason to do a wrong configuration just because you need a reboot from time to time. Why should the DC look for DNS queries in another DNS when that DC has the DNS locally? No sense.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Joe Richards [MVP]
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Erik Cheizoo
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- References:
- Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Gonzo
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Gonzo
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Jorge Silva
- Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- From: Joe Richards [MVP]
- Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- Prev by Date: Sick domain controller: SYSVOL issues
- Next by Date: RE: Importance of Database maintenance
- Previous by thread: Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- Next by thread: Re: Should DC's with DNS point to self first?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|