Re: LDAP/AD Problems Related to WAN?



You can use the ping utility to find the end-to-end MTU size:
ping.exe <dest> -f -l <size>

The -f switch prevents fragmentation of packets, the -l switch determines the packet size. If a packet size larger then the MTU is sent, no responses will be received (or an error is returned if it is enabled on the routers). The following article explains in more detail: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314825

--
Kind regards,

Erik Cheizoo
eXcellence & Difference - we keep your business running
============================================
Always test in a non-production environment before implementing
Guidelines for posting: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555375
============================================


"Andrew Hayes" <AndrewHayes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:687A1273-D9EF-4DC6-8F1D-EF233CE4A219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello again Paul. Thanks for the reply.

As you guessed, yes this WAN is a VPN between 2 Yamaha RTX1000 routers.
Don't have a great deal of information about them though as they are not our
equipment, but I would think that if the PMTU size was the issue it would
affect all communications between here and there. That is not the case. We
have other domain controllers for different forests at the remote location,
and the member servers for those domains that we have here don't have any
difficulties.

But, for future reference, how would I determine the PMTU size if I cannot
access the router configuration?

Moving on. NETDIAG is version 5.2.3790.1830 (srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447),
installed from a W2K3 with SP1 DVD, so I don't think that is the problem.
What I have done though is installed a new DC locally (in case the latency on
the WAN was causing problems), but that highlighted a different issue which
may be a cause or symptom of the problem I'm having with the member servers.

It seems that the second DC at the remote site cannot communicate over the
WAN either. That is, the new (third) DC is getting replication errors for the
second DC at the remote site, but not the first DC (the PDC) at the remote
site.

Starting to sound like an episode of "House", and I'm beginning to feel like
a dog chasing its tail. :-(

I've increased the size of the RPC Replication Timeout as per KB830746, and
while I was in the registry I also upped the Diagnostics levels to 5 for RPC
Client, Replication, Internal Processing, LDAP, Name Resolution and KCC. What
I'm seeing is that the RPC call from DC3 to DC2 is failing, and that is
having a domino effect on the whole of the replication process.

Next step for me is to determine the reason for the RPC failure. To that end
I'll be performing network traces on both DC's, and RPCpinging. Will let you
know what I find.

Cheers.

.



Relevant Pages

  • [UNIX] Buffer Overflow in Snort RPC Preprocessor
    ... A buffer overflow has been found in the Snort RPC normalization routines ... The first option will alert on any RPC fragmented record it finds. ... current packet length. ...
    (Securiteam)
  • TCP checksum change in RPC replies within XEN, NFS lockup (SLES10)
    ... There is also a SLES9 acting as a multi-homed NFS server. ... but not on the NFS client. ... DUMP Reply [Unreassembled Packet] ... I' NOT saysing that _all_ TCP checksums are bad, but significantly those RPC reply ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • RE: AD Replication problem
    ... The packet size does not limit the AD replication. ... Maximal Transmission Unit (MTU), which lives between second and third OSI ... > I start to ping sites and getting errors when packet reaches beyond certain ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • transactional replication performance -- packet size and buffer nu
    ... I have replication servers accross the ocean but the data volumn is so high ... I'm just wondering what is the best buffer size and packet size. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: Merge replication, modem connection problems
    ... I have tested with slow link profile, I have creted my own profile with very ... small packet size and nothing helps. ... "Hilary Cotter" wrote: ... >> I have problems with merge replication over modem connection. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)