Re: Security in AD



From a security point of view, what do I need to consider if I have a
number
of external companies using a shared AD ? I assume they'll go into
seperate OU's, but what security do I need in place to stop them viewing
anything they shouldn't?

You don't really want to do this. AD isn't designed to run multiple private
infrastructures. Also a given machine can only be a member of one domain,
so adding managed servers to this management domain will remove them from
their actual domain. This isn't a good idea.


From a networking point of view, is there anything I can do to stop the
huge
number of ports needed between a server and a domain controller?

Yes, you can use end-to-end IPSec, which means that all traffic is
encapsulated in an IPSec packet. This brings its own problems however, as
you cannot inspect those packets.


What attacks can happen using these open ports?
what tools available exploit these open ports?

That depends. Basically, having all those ports open is like being on a
LAN. The attacks are limited to what an attacker could do if he/ she were
on your LAN. There's all kinds of stuff the attacker could do.


How do you guys go about hardening your AD infrastructure?

That's different. We do this for our own infrastructure, which is a
completely different set of requirements.

--
Paul Williams
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
http://www.msresource.net | http://forums.msresource.net


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Full-disclosure] DNS spoofing issue. Thoughts on potential exploits
    ... Using a dedicated nameserver for SMTP leaves the system susceptible to ... use random source ports, both the firewall between the internal LAN and DMZ ... the attacker must get access to the LAN or in case to ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Exchange problems After changing FireWall Harware
    ... For a MS discussion of the ports needed for SBS and RWW, ... using any device on your LAN as a web server. ... DNS and DHCP on the server. ... I can't send mails to Internet by OWA ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Exhange 5.5 Behind Firewall?
    ... > internal LAN to our DMZ for protection. ... > and open ports just to allow the Exchange server to work. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Liunx and DSL routing
    ... to eth1 on the server. ... confused is the difference between the modem WAN and LAN addresses. ... > others mean just forwarding all the ports. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Firewall issue? Can nobody help me?
    ... only access certain internal boxes over certain ports and protocols ... Is it better to get a remote command prompt on a server on the LAN that has ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)

Loading