Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: "Jorge Silva" <jorgesilva_pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:38:56 +0100
ok...
but was my understanding that in case of manual BH, If there was no DC for a
specific NC in the list, replication will not occur out of site for that NC,
that's one of the reasons why if GCs in the branches, make all Bridgehead
Servers GCs
--
I hope that the information above helps you
Good Luck
Jorge Silva
MCSA
Systems Administrator
"Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]"
<SubstituteThisWithMyFullNameSeparatedByDots@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:um3CwUH9GHA.3384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
no need to...
as soon as the guy posts the event ID it explains everything...
as with the event ID you will find the problem description
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Jorge Silva" <jorgesilva_pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OSWxLQH9GHA.3736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I do not remember the event ID, but it is true the ISTG will choose a
non-BH, although manual list has been configured.
Can you give more detail about this?
--
I hope that the information above helps you
Good Luck
Jorge Silva
MCSA
Systems Administrator
"Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]"
<SubstituteThisWithMyFullNameSeparatedByDots@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OoJbsLH9GHA.3348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I mean:
You should at least have two for redundacy. If all the DCs in the manual
list become UNavailable the ISTG will not choose another DC for BH
services as
it would if nothing manual was defined
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]"
<SubstituteThisWithMyFullNameSeparatedByDots@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eP$2$DH9GHA.4708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you define a Bridgehead Server list it means that you are telling
the ISTG..."use only these DCs".
You should at least have two for redundacy. If all the DCs in the
manual list become available the ISTG will not choose another DC for BH
services as it would if nothing manual was defined.
I do not remember the event ID, but it is true the ISTG will choose a
non-BH, although manual list has been configured. This has got to do
with that a DC/GC needs to replicate a NC that is not being replicated
by the current BHs on the manual list. So it picks another DC that is
not in the manual BH list that does replicate the NC needed Depending
on the situation, you need to make sure that EACH NC in the forest is
replicated through the BH (in a multi-domain forest)...
what is the event ID? (I know it reports one)
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"spcqky" <spcqky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E837FF98-C0D5-4008-9917-6E7127A10602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
With Windows 2003, does ISTG automatically create NTDS connections on
non-bridgehead domain controller even though there are preferred
bridgehead
available in the AD site? What are the situations that this can
happen? (I am
seeing such a case but don't really know why it happens)
Please enlighten.
Thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: spcqky
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- References:
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: Jorge Silva
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP - DS]
- Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- Prev by Date: Re: Replication issues
- Next by Date: Re: Error migrating users/computers using ADMT
- Previous by thread: Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- Next by thread: Re: Replication and Preferred Bridgehead
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
