Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- From: "Henrik Skak Pedersen" <skak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:52:18 +0200
Hi Tomasz,
The reason for the 200 groups is that the application is using the groups as
granular permissions which then aggregates up into roles which also is
permissions groups.
The application is checking for permissions using standard .NET Framework
methods, so that should be ok.
Thanks
Henrik.
"Tomasz Onyszko" <T.Onyszko_nospam_@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OpKYQEd8GHA.4552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Henrik Skak Pedersen wrote:
Hello,
I have an application which creates aprox. 200 AD security groups. I have
heard from a customer that there is a performance problem if you have
more that 200 ad groups, is this true?
Nope, there shouldn't be any if there isn't some badly written application
which is doing something weired with AD.
BTW - have You asked them what is a reason for 200 groups for single app?
--
Tomasz Onyszko
http://www.w2k.pl/ - (PL)
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/ - (EN)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- References:
- More than 200 AD Security Groups
- From: Henrik Skak Pedersen
- Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- From: Tomasz Onyszko
- More than 200 AD Security Groups
- Prev by Date: Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- Next by Date: Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- Previous by thread: Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- Next by thread: Re: More than 200 AD Security Groups
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|