Re: Does windows xp use a gc in native mode?
- From: "Jorge Silva" <jorgesilva_pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:00:36 +0100
Hi
I was always under the impression that when you switched from 2003 mixed toThat's correct if you have more than one domain.
2003 native mode, it strictly used a GC for authentication for a domain.
ButSo what's the problem? The user uses that DC for authentication, and that DC
when I have a user with Windows XP sp1 connecting to a windows 2003 native
domain and i run the set command it comes up with the infrastrucuture
master
that is not a GC.
checks UGM with an available GC.
--
I hope that the information above helps you
Good Luck
Jorge Silva
MCSA
Systems Administrator
"Kahlan" <Kahlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E0635ED4-38D4-4C9D-9DD2-9CA104230229@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was always under the impression that when you switched from 2003 mixed to
2003 native mode, it strictly used a GC for authentication for a domain.
But
when I have a user with Windows XP sp1 connecting to a windows 2003 native
domain and i run the set command it comes up with the infrastrucuture
master
that is not a GC. So am I completely of base, or should I begin to
investigate this further to see what is causing this. Thanks
.
- Prev by Date: Re: user management hangs
- Next by Date: Re: Replication Problems
- Previous by thread: Re: Does windows xp use a gc in native mode?
- Next by thread: Re: Does windows xp use a gc in native mode?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|