Re: AD Design question

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



Thanks for the reply Paul.

Our current peer to peer has groups on a couple of "servers". And some
shares. Our problem has always been the dual funcionality of many
employees. How do you guys go about defining your groups. Do you have many
groups? Do you see this problem also and how do you overcome it?

Thanks.

"Paul Bergson" <pbergson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23tV5fsyrGHA.4844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You are a very small shop. Your need for a complicated OU structure would
only create unneeded complexities. The OU scenario for you should
probably fall on geographical boundries, personally I wouldn't even do
that, but that is just me. You should define your user access of data via
group control, assigning permissions to the groups and maintain group
membership to provide users access to these folders.

I also work for a Power Utility but we are much larger more of a midsized
firm with about 1,500 users. We have some OU structure but it is simple
we control all access via group membership.

--
Paul Bergson MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, CNE, CNA, CCA
http://www.pbbergs.com

Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

"SStory" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ODZDYdyrGHA.4424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We are relatively small organization as compared to some. We have 100+
employees, but only 50-60 are users. We have four geographical
sites--most things happen at site #1. We are a utility company. We are
planning to implement Server 2003 AD on a new server. The current
network is just one big peer-to-peer.

In trying to properly design the AD the first time, I have read Mark
Minasi's book (around 1600p) and some other resources. The main
questions that I'm uncertain as to how to answer involve OU's.

1.) Should an organization of our size use OU's? I'm thinking yes, but
not certain.
2.) Our shares are mostly used by accounting at present. However, I
expect that this will change as the server comes online and folks
understand what is possible.
I gather that I can use OU's and Groups and GPO's to more easily
manage access to shares and such. The challenge is obviously, if I use
OU's how to
determine what OU's are needed. Does anyone have insight, input
into this task? Major pitfalls?
3.) I read a chapter from "Windows 2003 Server Bible" published by
Wiley. The basic premise of it's OU design was to create OU's not along
departmental divisions, but KME (Key Management Entities). This goes
along with my inital thoughts, of surveying the organization to discover
distinct roles. This chapter said to create OU's, assign groups to them
and users to the groups. What are you opinions about this strategy?

Any comments and advice, hopefully from folks with experience in this,
would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Shane





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AD Design question
    ... You should define your user access of data via group control, ... planning to implement Server 2003 AD on a new server. ... Our shares are mostly used by accounting at present. ... Any comments and advice, hopefully from folks with experience in this, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • RE: How to Grant Power Users rights to administrative shares.
    ... This is on windows server 2003. ... right click shares and select new file share ... The "Create A Shared Folder Wizard" opens click next. ... Please check the permission settings of the shared folders. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: VPN access to network file shares
    ... "The file shares are on a server running Windows Small Business Server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Help needed with server setup at work
    ... Help needed with server setup at work ... home directories for all the employees client machines. ... Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, ... Putting a union NFS server up is just asking for trouble, ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Permissions Chart ?? or web site ??
    ... The environments I deal in tend to have tens of thousands of file shares and thousands of local site admins, 99% of whom don't really understand in the slightest bit how Windows works so the most secure way of doing things is the most simple to understand easily automated way. ... In fact, in most environments I have to work on file share stuff for, I redirect them from ad hoc shares to three types of shares per server and the local site admins don't even have to understand what a share is let alone properly configure it. ... One single share per server for apps run from the servers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)