Re: AD SSL, what impact?
- From: "Paul Williams [MVP]" <ptw2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:08:56 +0100
What's the problem with implementing an ECA? This is surprisingly simple,
easy to secure, and makes implementing SSL REALLY easy (you do nothing ;-)
You use 3rd-party certs and it might be a lot more work. Depends on whether
you can use auto-enrolment.
Only caveat that I came across (in a quick and dirty CA rollout) was the SP1
DCOM issue. But the read-me covers that (I just never bothered reading the
read-me!).
And what kind of impact enabling SSL might have if we deploy it to the
DC's?
Nothing springs to mind. It just means that you can now implement simple
binds in a safe and secure manner - which a lot of LDAP apps will want to
do.
--
Paul Williams
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
http://www.msresource.net | http://forums.msresource.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AD SSL, what impact?
- From: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\)
- Re: AD SSL, what impact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Configure server as DC
- Next by Date: Re: Restricting the size of each users home folder
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding users to a group
- Next by thread: Re: AD SSL, what impact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading