RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- From: "Neil Ruston" <NeilRuston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:35:41 -0800
Sorry - acronym error!
I assumed DL = dist list. You mean DL = domain local group. Let me use "DLG".
DLGs can contain members from any domain but can only be used to permission
resources in the local domain.
GGs can contain members only from the local domain but can be used to
permission resources in any domain.
(Any domain means any trusting/ed domain)
Does that help?
neil
"kr244" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you!
> But if I can't grant rights to DL groups how should the A-G-DL-P strategy
> work? I'm a little bit confused about that.
> As far as I understood, permissions should be linked to a DL-group and the
> accounts should be linked to G-group?!
>
> Michael
>
> "Neil Ruston" wrote:
>
> > DLs are not security groups and as such cannot be used to grant rights to
> > resources (they have a GUID but no SID).
> >
> > Either:
> > 1. Convert the DL to a security group
> > or
> > 2. Create a security group (such as a GG)
> >
> > then grant rights to that group created/converted above.
> >
> > neil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "kr244" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've got a Active Directory domain that contains 2 child domains.
> > >
> > > I'd like to publish the A-G-DL-P strategy for network permissions.
> > > But if I create a DL-group on one of the domain controllers and then try to
> > > grant permission to this group on a member server network share, this
> > > DL-group doesn't appear in the list of available groups and users.
> > > If I create a G-group on a DC and try to grant this group on the share, it
> > > works perfect.
> > >
> > > Any idea why DL-groups didn't appear on the network share?
> > >
> > > Thank U!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- From: kr244
- RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- References:
- RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- From: kr244
- RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- Prev by Date: Re: Trusting between Windows 2003 to Windows NT 4.0
- Next by Date: Re: certificate of type DomainController has failed
- Previous by thread: RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- Next by thread: RE: A-G-DL-P strategy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading