Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- From: Max Giessler <MaxGiessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:15:02 -0800
Thanks to all of you for your replies.
I thought user authentication is done by querying the GC not an 'ordinary'
DC? In this case it would make sense to keep down logon WAN traffic, but it
seems, this is not the case? Has that changed or am I simply wrong with my
assumption?
Thanks again,
Max
"Jorge de Almeida Pinto" wrote:
> that is true!
>
> better yet... it doesn't matter if all DCs are a GC!
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
> (HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
> # Jorge de Almeida Pinto #
> BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights!
> * Always test before implementing!
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "/kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:e7OwnhWFGHA.344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >">> We are planning to migrate from NT to one single AD 2003 domain. "
> >
> > In a single domain it matters little if all DC's are GC's.
> >
> > /kj
> >
> > "Jorge de Almeida Pinto"
> > <SubstituteThisWithMyFullNameSeparatedByDots@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:OT4JbGWFGHA.2012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> one GC per branch location should be enough.... if that one dies the
> >> queries will over the WAN link until the local DC/GC is restored
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> (HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
> >> # Jorge de Almeida Pinto #
> >> BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> * This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
> >> rights!
> >> * Always test before implementing!
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> "Max Giessler" <MaxGiessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:6824898C-2F6A-4879-82B4-7123B22E00E3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've got a question regarding the number of DCs (with GC functionality
> >>> enabled) per location.
> >>>
> >>> We are planning to migrate from NT to one single AD 2003 domain. Our
> >>> company
> >>> has several locations worldwide, each with 50 to 120 users. We plan
> >>> installing Exchange Standard servers in each location along with a DC,
> >>> which
> >>> also acts as a GC for the domain. The locations are connected with
> >>> eachother
> >>> by WAN links (~2MBit) in an IP VPN.
> >>>
> >>> Now the question is: Is one DC/GC sufficient or should for backup
> >>> purposes
> >>> two (or even more) DCs be installed per location? In my opinion one
> >>> should be
> >>> enough as in case of failure, the other location's GC could be queried
> >>> for
> >>> user logon etc.
> >>>
> >>> I'd be happy to receive your feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and regards,
> >>> Max
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- References:
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- From: /kj
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- Prev by Date: Re: AD Site Links Doubts
- Next by Date: Re: Software Restrictions
- Previous by thread: Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- Next by thread: Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|