Re: Replicating AD to another server
- From: "Herb Martin" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:58:40 -0600
<jude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136833661.255540.208700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes, this makes sense. My goal is to run them in tandem. But what about
> the name issue? They have to have different names, right? My set up is
> essentially 1 DC with several OU's (sites) because we don't have very
> many users. Thanks.
Yes they must both have different names.
If you want them to also be File Servers AND to be fault
tolerant then you can use DFS (with replication) to provide
a single naming hierarchy for multiple file servers.
--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replicating AD to another server
- From: jude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Replicating AD to another server
- References:
- Replicating AD to another server
- From: jude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Replicating AD to another server
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: Replicating AD to another server
- From: jude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Replicating AD to another server
- Prev by Date: Re: FSMO role issues after demoting and re-promoting server
- Next by Date: Re: Number of DCs/GCs per location
- Previous by thread: Re: Replicating AD to another server
- Next by thread: Re: Replicating AD to another server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|