Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- From: R. E. Wendel <REWendel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:37:04 -0800
Can the GCs "effectively" provide auth for more than one domain on a single
site, regardless of security implications?
"Al Mulnick" wrote:
> Did that link satisfy the question or were there others?
>
>
> "R. E. Wendel" <REWendel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:F9744C95-2FE9-436E-B1A7-F588DB4C677F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Regardless of AD security, we are implementing separate network level
> > protections in order to directly address security issues. Currently just
> > shutting the two worlds off from one another is growing to be more of a
> > hassle than it is worth. Some measures we are looking at are:
> >
> > a) promiscuous port assignments to all clients, except IT
> > b) tiered network security on important servers/services (no need for
> > clients to be able to connect directly to Oracle when they go through a
> > middle-tier anyway; same for front-end/back-end exchange). Some of this is
> > done, but not finished.
> > c) no secured data would be available on any machine network-ly accessible
> > from student machines. we are going to keep the student machines separated
> > by
> > vlan and acls, so this is still cake.
> > d) remote sites would not actually contain secure data at all. links
> > joining
> > major campuses A/B/C will be 10MB metro-ethernet connection, with 3MB dsl
> > connections bringing in sites D/E. D/E only have 1-3 admin/faculty staff
> > on
> > them anyway, so load is not a big deal. students don't get separate
> > logons,
> > as I realize that the replication of thousands of logons would sig.
> > increase
> > load. we are doing sso stuff for students, but everything is web based
> > through a portal, not windows logon based.
> > e) trust would be one way (student machines allow admin logon, admin
> > machines reject student logon)
> >
> > I understand the trusts. My primary question really related around whether
> > I
> > can have a single domain controller (GC) provide authentication for both
> > domains on each of the remote sites.
> >
> > "Al Mulnick" wrote:
> >
> >> Now, my questions:
> >> A) GCs will authenticate for any domain in the forest, right?
> >> B) Any problems with above?
> >>
> >> A = Here's a much more in-depth discussion of authentication and security
> >> services.
> >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/e36ceae6-ff36-4a1b-9895-75f0eacfe94c.mspx
> >>
> >> B = Problems? Aside from your expectations of authentication (see A
> >> above
> >> to clarify them and note that it's my impression of your expectation that
> >> I'm basing that on) I think you should carefully consider the security
> >> implications. You can have forest trusts if that's needed, but knowing
> >> that
> >> you're a school tells me that you have students. Students are curious
> >> critters by nature. As such, they *could* decide to load a program that
> >> tries to gain access to your forest. I suppose they could even try to
> >> gain
> >> access to your forest. Since the domain is not a security boundary, the
> >> risk is higher and you should carefully consider the tradeoffs you
> >> expect.
> >> If you've already done that, then the placement of your solution would be
> >> more dependent on your available network bandwidth.
> >>
> >> Al
> >>
> >>
> >> "R. E. Wendel" <REWendel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:0380E022-493C-411D-AA32-74378EA10C87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >I am looking to do a few things in the very near future concerning our
> >> >AD
> >> > layout and would like to ask a few questions, give my design, and see
> >> > if
> >> > it
> >> > floats.
> >> >
> >> > We are a school. Currently we have 2 separate domains: one
> >> > administrative,
> >> > one student.
> >> >
> >> > They do not have trusts because the former network operators did not
> >> > see
> >> > the
> >> > need. I do.
> >> >
> >> > So we have 5 sites, currently we only have domain controllers on 3 of
> >> > them
> >> > (our full sized campuses, the other two are small single building
> >> > remote
> >> > sites). The Main campus is A, the two large campuses are B & C, and the
> >> > two
> >> > small sites are D & E.
> >> >
> >> > In order to support the current design, obviously we have 2 domain
> >> > controllers on each campus A, B, & C. Currently we cannot setup trusts
> >> > between the existing b/c as a school, security is an issue, so we
> >> > restrict
> >> > ALL traffic between the sides, save for VNC one way from admin to
> >> > student
> >> > for
> >> > remote management. We will be opening up this, as we are implementing
> >> > more
> >> > standard security practices.
> >> >
> >> > I would like to move to the following topology:
> >> >
> >> > Site A := 2 primary DCs (one admin, one student)
> >> > Site B & C := 1 DC each site, both being GCs, providing DNS, DHCP, and
> >> > AD
> >> > services for both domains
> >> > Site D & E := same as B & C, with spare servers from B & C redes.
> >> >
> >> > Now, my questions:
> >> > A) GCs will authenticate for any domain in the forest, right?
> >> > B) Any problems with above?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- References:
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- From: R. E. Wendel
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- Next by Date: Re: Error : No se encuentra el Objeto DSA
- Previous by thread: Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: AD forest layout recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|