Re: KB 244368 still available in Windows 2003 very large networks?

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



Active Directory on Windows Server 2003 radically improves the large forest
replication model over Windows 2000.
That KB would not necessarily apply to Windows 2003. The KCC is vastly
improved for replication topology. Have you read up on the 2003
capabilities yet? You'll see some documents at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRef/a860fc4d-ca3c-4d03-b83b-74147dcfc0d9.mspx

I'm sure there's a document that outlines the changes in KCC somewhere, but
I'm not seeing it at the moment. Maybe somebody else can post it?

Out of curiosity, why 70 domains? What's the point of that? Politics?

The biggest issue here, as you're likely aware, is that you'll have to
completely change the mindset that the organization is currently operating
under. Once you go to a new AD infrastructure, you'll really want to be
careful of the way it's managed, how it supports applications, and most
importantly how quickly you can recover from issues ranging from minor to
massive failures. A 70 domain infrastructure doesn't lend itself well to
recovery IMHO and offers very little benefit over other models with far
fewer domains. Certainly nothing about administration. If you have a
chance, revisit the domain model and see if you can't whittle that away to
1-5 domains (maximum) which would give you far simpler control and process
requirements at a cost of changing the way people do their current business.
I would heavily argue that to do otherwise will put the long term usability
and supportability at risk in any organization with that kind of structure.
I've seen it too many times ;)





"omg" <ovidiu_m_gheorghita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136210517.027986.31910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> Is the KB 244368 "How to Optimize Active Directory Replication in a
> Large Network" still available for wery large Windows 2003 networks?
>
> Could I let the KCC take in charge the inter-site replication in a
> Windows 2003 forest with more than 70 domains and more than 300 sites?
> The forest will be built by migrate/consolidate a lot of Windows NT
> 4.0/2000/2003 currently independent domains/forests in the same
> existent Windows 2003 forest (currently in native mode).
>
> Thank you,
> omg
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: "Windows 2000 native" vs "Windows 2003 Server" functional leve
    ... going to "Windows 2003 Server" level. ... Do you know if I can just upgrade the domain level (and wait with forest ... all domains to w2k3 domain func level and then the forest itself to w2k3 ... replication in Windows 2003, but is this only working if the domain ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Problem raising forest functional level to Windows 2003
    ... replmon and repladmin /showrepl shows successful replication between the ... All DC's are running Windows ... >>trying to raise the forest functional level from Windows 2000 to 2003. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Folder Redirection over a slow WAN
    ... to install Windows Server 2003 at the remote site, ... Frequently Asked Questions About Windows Small Business Server 2003 ... the replication depends on replication schedule you have ... Policy slow link detection to limit to apply group policy for the branch ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: NTFRS
    ... I was worried this would create a new sysvol but it hasn't so it looks to be ... I have no outbound replication showing from repadmin on Win2003 ... The server holding the PDC role is down. ... Windows 2003 - no other controllers. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • RE: Help - Users cant log in ...
    ... I ran adprep/forestprep & domain prep on windows 2000 server ... I loaded Active directory to the 2003 server and made it a second DC ... > replication of Active Directory. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)