Re: Maximum recommended number of objects (OUs) under one OU
- From: "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:18:42 -0500
Agreed, don't confuse the GUI having issues because it has to pull everything at once to properly display it with AD having issues. In large environments I don't recommend the GUI at all and that is one of the reasons. Of course, it takes a heck of a lot more knowledge to do things if you don't use the GUI.
-- Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services www.joeware.net
Paul Williams [MVP] wrote:
Probably, but it's much larger than 110,000. We're talking millions. Although some of the GUI tools might struggle with these numbers. Generally, in large deployments a lot of the tasks will be automated (scripted) and lots of other manual tasks will be done with command line and bespoke tools designed to work with this environment.
Do you actually need an enormous number of OUs under an OU or are you just sizing and testing?
.
- References:
- Re: Maximum recommended number of objects (OUs) under one OU
- From: Paul Williams [MVP]
- Re: Maximum recommended number of objects (OUs) under one OU
- Prev by Date: Re: Why A-G-DL-P?
- Next by Date: Re: Urgent Replication between Sites
- Previous by thread: Re: Maximum recommended number of objects (OUs) under one OU
- Next by thread: Re: Maximum recommended number of objects (OUs) under one OU
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|