Re: Replication protocol (IP or SMTP)
- From: "Brian Desmond [MVP]" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:26:26 -0400
To further clarify, SMTP is usually best in a location where you have a
highly latent conenction and the rpc streams are going to time out more
often than not. SMTP will just keep retrying as thats the nature of how it
works.
--
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
Windows Server MVP
www.briandesmond.com
"Paul Williams [MVP]" <ptw2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uKssSbH1FHA.268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm not sure why FRS comes into this. FRS doesn't replicate the domain
> NC -
> it only replicates SYSVOL, which is very much independent of the rest of
> the
> AD replication.
>
> SMTP can only replicate Schema, Configuration and Global Catalog. SMTP
> would be used in a scenario where you have one or two domain controllers
> that are the only DCs for the domain at a very remote location where there
> is a very poor, unreliable network, or where there is a very expensive
> network, for example. In this case, the domain replication occurs locally
> over RPC; the rest of the forest stuff is replicated infrequently over
> SMTP.
>
> I assume one of the reasons that you must use RPC for domain replication
> is
> because of the frequency of the changes, and things like password changes,
> and urgent notification, etc. Probably because RPC is more reliable and
> secure than SMTP as well.
>
> --
> Paul Williams
> Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
> http://www.msresource.net | http://forums.msresource.net
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Replication protocol (IP or SMTP)
- From: akn
- Replication protocol (IP or SMTP)
- Prev by Date: Re: Printer Aliasing in Active Directory
- Next by Date: question about user rights
- Previous by thread: Replication protocol (IP or SMTP)
- Next by thread: Re: Replication protocol (IP or SMTP)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
